[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110509124022.GD3225@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 14:40:23 +0200
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Ashish Jangam <Ashish.Jangam@...tcummins.com>
Cc: "sameo@...nedhand.com" <sameo@...nedhand.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dajun Chen <Dajun.Chen@...semi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 -next] MFD: MFD module of DA9052 PMIC driver
On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 04:03:41PM +0530, Ashish Jangam wrote:
> > > +static void da9052_irq_sync_unlock(struct irq_data *data)
> > > +{
> > > + struct da9052 *da9052 = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
> > > + struct da9052_irq_data *irq_data = irq_to_da9052_irq(da9052,
> > > + data->irq);
> > > +
> > > + da9052_mask_events(da9052, irq_data->event);
> > > + mutex_unlock(&da9052->irq_lock);
> > What happens if an event was enabled while the bus was locked?
Fix your MUA to word wrap within paragraphs.
> Event stays in the hardware till it's not explicitly cleared. Hence
> there won't be any event loss.
You're missing the point here. You've not understood what the purpose
of the lock and unlock are - they should be syncing back changes to the
mask state that were made while the lock was held. This is doing
something totally different.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists