linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drivers/mmc/card/block.c: fix potential null dereference 'idata'

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4DC802C0.9040302@gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 09 May 2011 17:05:36 +0200
From:	Vladimir Motyka <vladimir.motyka@...il.com>
To:	Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
CC:	cjb@...top.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/mmc/card/block.c: fix potential null dereference
 'idata'

On 05/09/2011 04:32 PM, Julia Lawall wrote:
> On Mon, 9 May 2011, Vladimir Motyka wrote:
> 
>> When allocation of idata fails there was a null dereferece.
> 
> Why not have a different label for the two cases?  That would make the 
> code easier to statically analyze, and perhaps be more understandable as 
> well.
> 
> julia
>
I think You are right. So it could be better like this?

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/card/block.c b/drivers/mmc/card/block.c
index 3dec493..a03cdc6 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/card/block.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/card/block.c
@@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ static struct mmc_blk_ioc_data
*mmc_blk_ioctl_copy_from_user(
 	idata = kzalloc(sizeof(*idata), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!idata) {
 		err = -ENOMEM;
-		goto copy_err;
+		goto alloc_err;
 	}

 	if (copy_from_user(&idata->ic, user, sizeof(idata->ic))) {
@@ -266,9 +266,9 @@ static struct mmc_blk_ioc_data
*mmc_blk_ioctl_copy_from_user(
 	return idata;

 copy_err:
-	if(idata)
-		kfree(idata->buf);
+	kfree(idata->buf);
 	kfree(idata);
+alloc_err:
 	return ERR_PTR(err);
 }

Or it could return right after allocation fails so there needn't be
goto. It is simplier, but maybe worse looking and to read. What is your
opinion?

Vladimir Motyka

> 
>> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Motyka <vladimir.motyka@...il.com>
>>
>> ---
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/card/block.c b/drivers/mmc/card/block.c
>> index 407836d..3dec493 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/card/block.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/card/block.c
>> @@ -266,10 +266,10 @@ static struct mmc_blk_ioc_data
>> *mmc_blk_ioctl_copy_from_user(
>>  	return idata;
>>
>>  copy_err:
>> -	kfree(idata->buf);
>> +	if(idata)
>> +		kfree(idata->buf);
>>  	kfree(idata);
>>  	return ERR_PTR(err);
>> -
>>  }
>>
>>  static int mmc_blk_ioctl_cmd(struct block_device *bdev,
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/