linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next 5/4] tulip: xircom_cb: Remove useless func_enter and func

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20110509.121026.28826727.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Mon, 09 May 2011 12:10:26 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	joe@...ches.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 5/4] tulip: xircom_cb: Remove useless
 func_enter and func_exit

From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Date: Mon, 09 May 2011 12:08:01 -0700

> On Mon, 2011-05-09 at 11:47 -0700, David Miller wrote:
>> With the advent of the function tracer, those silly function entry/exit
>> logging things are entirely superfluous.
>> They make the code look ugly too.
> 
> I don't much like a lot of debugging messages
> throughout drivers/net, but that's a whole 'nother
> set of patches.
> 
>> Please do that and respin this patch set, thanks Joe!
> 
> How 'bout I just add another patch to delete them.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>

How about you just respin the patch set as I asked you to?

It makes no sense to "fix" something you're just going to
delete in the very next commit.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/