[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m1bozbtx0y.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>
Date: Mon, 09 May 2011 13:54:37 -0700
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
hadi@...erus.ca, daniel.lezcano@...e.fr, containers@...ts.osdl.org,
renatowestphal@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Network namespace manipulation with file descriptors
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> writes:
> From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
> Date: Mon, 09 May 2011 12:59:55 -0700
>
>> David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> writes:
>>
>>> The networking bits look OK to me:
>>>
>>> Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
>>
>> Are you merging sendmmsg through the netdev tree?
>
> Yes.
>
>> The conflicts on syscall syscall numbers are an unfortunate pain.
>
> The way we've solved this before is the tree that cares pulls in
> the net-next-2.6 tree to resolve the conflict.
If that is the precedent that then that makes sense. You are good
at not rewinding net-next so I don't expect there will be a problem
there.
Do you know if there are any plans to support sendmmsg on parisc for
2.6.40? That could get sticky as the parisc tree has a bunch of syscall
catchup support they are doing now.
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists