[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1304979549.4865.56.camel@mulgrave.site>
Date: Mon, 09 May 2011 17:19:09 -0500
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mikulas Patocka <mikulas@...ax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Don't mlock guardpage if the stack is growing up
On Mon, 2011-05-09 at 15:07 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Regardless, I'd like to hear whether this patch really does work on
> PA-RISC and especially IA64. I think those are the only cases that
> have a GROWSUP stack. And the IA64 case that supports both is the most
> interesting, everybody else does just one or the other.
So I can test the patch, if you tell me how. I don't use lvm2, so it
would have to be a simple test case.
James
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists