linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] Consolidate i8253 clocksource

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1304983762.2939.39.camel@work-vm>
Date:	Mon, 09 May 2011 16:29:22 -0700
From:	John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
To:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Consolidate i8253 clocksource

On Mon, 2011-05-09 at 14:27 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> Three architectures have an i8253 PIT clocksource, and each duplicates
> the code for this.  The initial patch extracts a common implementation
> to drivers/clocksource, and subsequent patches convert each architecture
> to use this copy.

Very cool! The series looks good to me. 

Although maybe should we get rid of the inb_p redefinitions in a later
cleanup? 

Acked-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>

thanks
-john


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/