linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V4 1/5] dmaengine/dw_dmac: don't call callback routine in case dmaengine_terminate

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1304917371.32447.10.camel@vkoul-udesk3>
Date:	Mon, 09 May 2011 10:32:51 +0530
From:	"Koul, Vinod" <vinod.koul@...el.com>
To:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...com>
Cc:	dan.j.williams@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	armando.visconti@...com, shiraz.hashim@...com,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, viresh.linux@...il.com,
	linux@....linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 1/5] dmaengine/dw_dmac: don't call callback routine
 in case dmaengine_terminate_all() is called

On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 17:30 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> If dmaengine_terminate_all() is called for dma channel, then it doesn't make
> much sense to call registered callback routine. While in case of success or
> failure it must be called.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...com>
> ---
>  drivers/dma/dw_dmac.c |   31 ++++++++++++++++---------------
>  1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw_dmac.c b/drivers/dma/dw_dmac.c
> index 1bd4803..d28cd84 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/dw_dmac.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/dw_dmac.c
> @@ -195,18 +195,21 @@ static void dwc_dostart(struct dw_dma_chan *dwc, struct dw_desc *first)
>  /*----------------------------------------------------------------------*/
>  

> -	/*
> -	 * The API requires that no submissions are done from a
> -	 * callback, so we don't need to drop the lock here
> -	 */
> -	if (callback)
> -		callback(param);
> +	if (callback_required) {
> +		if (callback)
> +			callback(param);
> +	}
How about changing this to:
	if (callback_required && callback)
		callback(param)
This will make it look cleaner ...


-- 
~Vinod

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/