[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110510175746.0a1fbe40.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 17:57:46 +0900
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: mmotm 2011-05-06-16-39 uploaded
On Fri, 06 May 2011 16:39:31 -0700
akpm@...ux-foundation.org wrote:
> memcg-reclaim-memory-from-nodes-in-round-robin-order.patch
> memcg-reclaim-memory-from-nodes-in-round-robin-fix.patch
I'm very sorry that this fix is required for this logic.
==
next_scan_node_update is the time when scan_nodes nodemask should be updated.
Then, time_after() is correct. Otherwise, next-scan_node_update is intialized
to be 0 and time_before() returns always true, scan_nodes never be updated.
Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
---
mm/memcontrol.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: mmotm-May6/mm/memcontrol.c
===================================================================
--- mmotm-May6.orig/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ mmotm-May6/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -1517,7 +1517,7 @@ static void mem_cgroup_may_update_nodema
{
int nid;
- if (time_before(mem->next_scan_node_update, jiffies))
+ if (time_after(mem->next_scan_node_update, jiffies))
return;
mem->next_scan_node_update = jiffies + 10*HZ;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists