[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110510113913.GA6779@jolsa.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 13:39:13 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kprobes,x86: disable irq durinr optimized callback
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 12:40:19PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> > + local_irq_save(flags);
> > preempt_disable();
> > if (kprobe_running()) {
> > kprobes_inc_nmissed_count(&op->kp);
> > @@ -1208,6 +1210,7 @@ static void __kprobes optimized_callback(struct optimized_kprobe *op,
> > __this_cpu_write(current_kprobe, NULL);
> > }
> > preempt_enable_no_resched();
> > + local_irq_restore(flags);
>
> irq-disable is synonymous to preempt disable so the preempt_disable()/enable()
> pair looks like superfluous overhead.
yes, there's correct patch already in the list here:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=130382756829695&w=2
thanks,
jirka
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists