linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHSET v3.1 0/7] data integrity: Stabilize pages during writeback for various fses

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110510145421.GJ4402@quack.suse.cz>
Date:	Tue, 10 May 2011 16:54:21 +0200
From:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To:	OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
Cc:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...ibm.com>,
	Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
	Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>,
	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
	Joel Becker <jlbec@...lplan.org>,
	linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, Mingming Cao <mcao@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET v3.1 0/7] data integrity: Stabilize pages during
 writeback for various fses

On Tue 10-05-11 23:05:41, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote:
> OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp> writes:
> 
> > Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz> writes:
> >
> >>> I see. So many block layer stuff sounds like broken on corner case? If
> >>> so, I more feel this approach should be temporary workaround, and should
> >>> use another less-blocking approach.
> >>   Not many but some... The alternative to less blocking approach is to do
> >> copy-out before a page is submitted for IO (or various middle ground
> >> alternatives of doing sometimes copyout, sometimes blocking...). That costs
> >> some performance as well. We talked about it at LSF and the approach
> >> Darrick is implementing was considered the least intrusive. There's really
> >> no way to fix these corner cases and keep performance.
> >
> > You already considered, to copy only if page was writeback (like
> > copy-on-write). I.e. if page is on I/O, copy, then switch the page for
> > writing new data.
> 
> missed question mark in here.
> 
> Did you already consider, to copy only if page was writeback (like
> copy-on-write)? I.e. if page is on I/O, copy, then switch the page for
> writing new data.
  Yes, that was considered as well. We'd have to essentially migrate the
page that is under writeback and should be written to. You are going to pay
the cost of page allocation, copy, increased memory & cache pressure.
Depending on your backing storage and workload this may or may not be better
than waiting for IO...

								Honza

-- 
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/