linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 02/11] ptrace: implement PTRACE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110510181902.GA3273@redhat.com>
Date:	Tue, 10 May 2011 20:19:02 +0200
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:	jan.kratochvil@...hat.com, vda.linux@...glemail.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, indan@....nu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/11] ptrace: implement PTRACE_SEIZE

On 05/10, Tejun Heo wrote:
>
> I think this basically is the same problem as the using TRAPPING on
> PTRACE_DETACH one.  Do you recall the original version where TRAPPING
> was cleared on kill

Yes, and it was me who suggested to not do this ;)

> I think that's what we should do.

Yes, I thought about this too. But I am still not sure, _perhaps_ this
needs more thinking. Just a fuzzy feeling, I do not have any particular
idea right now.

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/