[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110510073931.GI11595@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 09:39:31 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: David Sharp <dhsharp@...gle.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Vaibhav Nagarnaik <vnagarnaik@...gle.com>,
Michael Rubin <mrubin@...gle.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: Fix powerTOP regression with 2.6.39-rc5
* David Sharp <dhsharp@...gle.com> wrote:
> I believe it's been suggested that trace-cmd should be part of the kernel
> tree, just like the perf tool. This would be nice, and would more easily
> allow them to share this parsing code. It would also give them a common place
> to work on their unification.
Thomas and me has done some work on providing that functionality, see the
tip:perf/trace2 branch:
http://people.redhat.com/mingo/tip.git/README
Do 'trace -a' to do system-wide tracing. It still needs quite some work, help
is welcome :)
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists