linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4] sdio: optimized SDIO IRQ handling for single irq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 11 May 2011 10:40:13 -0400
From:	Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>
To:	Per Forlin <per.forlin@...aro.org>
Cc:	linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] sdio: optimized SDIO IRQ handling for single irq

Hi Per,

On Wed, May 11 2011, Per Forlin wrote:
> Optimize performance for single irq
>
> Changes since v2.
>  * Rebase on mmc-next, change of line numbers no code changes.
>
> Stefan Nilsson XK (1):
>   sdio: optimized SDIO IRQ handling for single irq
>
>  drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c |   33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  include/linux/mmc/card.h    |    1 +
>  2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

Odd, still doesn't apply here:

error: patch failed: drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c:42
error: drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c: patch does not apply

patch -p1 says:
Hunk #2 succeeded at 53 with fuzz 1.

So this still isn't rebased onto mmc-next properly.  There haven't been
any changes to drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c since 2008, though, so now
I'm wondering where you got the fuzz from..

- Chris.
-- 
Chris Ball   <cjb@...top.org>   <http://printf.net/>
One Laptop Per Child
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/