[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4DCA40E8.3090805@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 16:55:20 +0900
From: Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
CC: Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Bharata B Rao <bharata@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Dhaval Giani <dhaval.giani@...il.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ibm.com>,
Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 01/15] sched: (fixlet) dont update shares twice on on_rq
parent
(2011/05/10 17:32), Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 16:14 +0900, Hidetoshi Seto wrote:
>> This small fixlet can stand alone.
>> Peter, how about getting this into git tree first?
>
> tip 2f36825b176f67e5c5228aa33d828bc39718811f contains the below.
>
> /* Don't dequeue parent if it has other entities besides us */
> - if (cfs_rq->load.weight)
> + if (cfs_rq->load.weight) {
> + /*
> + * Bias pick_next to pick a task from this cfs_rq, as
> + * p is sleeping when it is within its sched_slice.
> + */
> + if (task_sleep && parent_entity(se))
> + set_next_buddy(parent_entity(se));
> break;
> + }
> flags |= DEQUEUE_SLEEP;
> }
Oh, thanks Mike!
It seems that this change in tip is better one.
Paul, don't you mind rebasing your patches onto tip/sched/core next time?
(...or is there better branch for rebase?)
Thanks,
H.Seto
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists