[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m2oc39i1ca.fsf@firstfloor.org>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 10:39:01 -0700
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "Ted Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] comm: Introduce comm_lock seqlock to protect task->comm access
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org> writes:
>
> The next step is to go through and convert all comm accesses to
> use get_task_comm(). This is substantial, but can be done bit by
> bit, reducing the race windows with each patch.
... and after that rename the field.
-Andi
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists