[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110511205404.GZ2505@legolas.emea.dhcp.ti.com>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 23:54:09 +0300
From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
To: Tanya Brokhman <tlinder@...eaurora.org>
Cc: balbi@...com, greg@...ah.com, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, ablay@...eaurora.org,
'Maya Erez' <merez@...eaurora.org>,
'open list' <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 5/7] usb: Add streams support to the gadget framework
Hi,
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 04:29:44PM +0300, Tanya Brokhman wrote:
> Hi Felipe
>
> > > @@ -129,6 +132,22 @@ ep_matches (
> > > }
> > >
> > > /*
> > > + * Get the number of required streams from the EP companion
> > > + * descriptor and see if the EP matches it
> > > + */
> > > + if (usb_endpoint_xfer_bulk(desc)) {
> > > + if (ep_comp) {
> > > + num_req_streams = ep_comp->bmAttributes & 0x1f;
> > > + if (num_req_streams > ep->max_streams)
> > > + return 0;
> >
> > We would like the gadget drivers to all with all controllers, this
> > would
> > likely be better to ask from controller driver for N streams but work
> > if
> > we get less ? Something like:
> >
> > struct usb_gadget_ops {
> > ...
> > request_stream(struct usb_gadget *g, int max_streams);
> > };
> >
> > if (usb_endpoint_xfer_bulk(desc)) {
> > if (ep_comp) {
> > num_req_streams = usb_gadget_request_streams(gadget,
> > ep_comp->bmAttributes & 0x1f);
> >
> > /* now patch ep_comp descriptor */
> > ep_comp->bmAttributes = num_req_streams;
> > }
> > }
> >
> > this way, different function drivers can request for a different number
> > of streams and controller driver is required to keep track of total
> > number of streams, and number of "busy" streams.
> >
>
> I'm not sure I understand what you meant by the above..
> When choosing this approach we thought of the following design:
> Each controller knows how many streams it supports for each endpoint and
> inits the ep->max_streams filed accordingly. Each gadget driver declares the
> number of streams it wishes to operate with using the comp_desc and if the
> endpoint can support the requested number of streams - it's allocated for
> that gadget driver. If no matching endpoint is found - it's up to the gadget
> driver to decide what to do next. One approach could be to try and configure
> the endpoint with less streams. For example in UAS if configuring the
> endpoint with streams>0 fails, we fall back to HS mode where no streams are
> required.
>
> Does this address your concerns? Perhaps this is what you meant...
Ok, I understand what you meant now.
> > Another approach would be to require function drivers to request the
> > streams during bind by themselves and only give this layer correct
> > descriptors, which allow you to make those arguments const.
>
> Actually, during bind we still don't know the connection speed so the number
> of streams can't be determined at that point. For example: when UAS gadget
> driver operates in HS mode the number of streams is 0, when in SS > 0. I
> think this is the right place for streams configuration.
true, didn't think it that way ;-)
--
balbi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists