| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20110511211401.GC4893@kroah.com> Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 14:14:01 -0700 From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> To: matt mooney <mfmooney@...il.com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/12] staging: usbip: miscellaneous code cleanup On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 01:54:12AM -0700, matt mooney wrote: > Hi Greg, > > I am interested in hearing your thoughts on the userspace interface? Which one? The user/kernel interface? > Even as is, it definitely needs some work. For one thing I was thinking > of removing the debug flag from userspace. The userspace utilites are > not using it anyway, and it is not 100% working yet. I haven't looked at the interface much yet, what is your issue with the debug flag? To make things easier, and allow you to be able to change the userspace interface, I suggest moving the userspace code into the kernel tree, and building it here. That would allow you to move forward with changing things easier, doing it all in one place allows you to keep stuff in sync, and provides people an easier way to actually get the needed tools to drive the code. What do you think about doing that? I've applied a number of these patches, care to respin the others and resend them based on my latest tree? thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists