[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110511210639.GA4679@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 14:06:39 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: matt mooney <mfmooney@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/12] staging: usbip: replace usbip_u{dbg,err,info} and
printk with pr_ equivalent
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 01:54:16AM -0700, matt mooney wrote:
> This switches all of the non dev_<level> print statements to use the
> pr_<level> macros. And a few debug statements are removed.
Can't most of these be moved to use the dev_* calls instead?
>
> Signed-off-by: matt mooney <mfm@...eddisk.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/usbip/stub_dev.c | 22 ++--
> drivers/staging/usbip/stub_main.c | 19 ++--
> drivers/staging/usbip/stub_rx.c | 24 ++--
> drivers/staging/usbip/stub_tx.c | 16 ++--
> drivers/staging/usbip/usbip_common.c | 228 +++++++++++++++------------------
> drivers/staging/usbip/usbip_common.h | 46 +------
> drivers/staging/usbip/usbip_event.c | 3 +-
> drivers/staging/usbip/vhci_hcd.c | 87 +++++--------
> drivers/staging/usbip/vhci_rx.c | 33 +++---
> drivers/staging/usbip/vhci_sysfs.c | 14 +-
> drivers/staging/usbip/vhci_tx.c | 8 +-
> 11 files changed, 209 insertions(+), 291 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/usbip/stub_dev.c b/drivers/staging/usbip/stub_dev.c
> index c71d0a3..0c0d838 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/usbip/stub_dev.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/usbip/stub_dev.c
> @@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ static void stub_shutdown_connection(struct usbip_device *ud)
> * step 1?
> */
> if (ud->tcp_socket) {
> - usbip_udbg("shutdown tcp_socket %p\n", ud->tcp_socket);
> + pr_debug("shutdown tcp_socket %p\n", ud->tcp_socket);
Like here, we have a valid struct device pointer from what I can tell,
so we should use dev_dbg() instead of pr_debug().
I think a lot of these conversions could use those calls here, right?
So care to split this into 2 patches, one that converts to valid usages
of the dev_* calls, and the other a patch that converts the rest to pr_*
calls?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists