[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <34783.1305155494@localhost>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 19:11:34 -0400
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.39-rc6-mmotm0506 - lockdep splat in RCU code on page fault
On Tue, 10 May 2011 01:20:29 PDT, "Paul E. McKenney" said:
Would test, but it doesn't apply cleanly to my -mmotm0506 tree:
> diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
> index 5616b17..20c22c5 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcutree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
> @@ -1525,13 +1525,15 @@ static void rcu_cpu_kthread_setrt(int cpu, int to_rt)
> */
> static void rcu_cpu_kthread_timer(unsigned long arg)
> {
> - unsigned long flags;
> + unsigned long old;
> + unsigned long new;
> struct rcu_data *rdp = per_cpu_ptr(rcu_state->rda, arg);
> struct rcu_node *rnp = rdp->mynode;
>
> - raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp->lock, flags);
> - rnp->wakemask |= rdp->grpmask;
> - raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
> + do {
> + old = rnp->wakemask;
> + new = old | rdp->grpmask;
> + } while (cmpxchg(&rnp->wakemask, old, new) != old);
> invoke_rcu_node_kthread(rnp);
> }
My source has this:
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp->lock, flags);
rnp->wakemask |= rdp->grpmask;
invoke_rcu_node_kthread(rnp);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
the last 2 lines swapped from what you diffed against. I can easily work around
that, except it's unclear what the implications of the invoke_rcu moving outside
of the irq save/restore pair (or if it being inside is the actual root cause)...
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists