[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110511110613.GB2390@jolsa.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 13:06:13 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH, v2] kprobes, x86: Disable irq during optimized callback
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 01:44:18PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 12:40:19PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > >
> > > * Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > + local_irq_save(flags);
> > > > preempt_disable();
> > > > if (kprobe_running()) {
> > > > kprobes_inc_nmissed_count(&op->kp);
> > > > @@ -1208,6 +1210,7 @@ static void __kprobes optimized_callback(struct optimized_kprobe *op,
> > > > __this_cpu_write(current_kprobe, NULL);
> > > > }
> > > > preempt_enable_no_resched();
> > > > + local_irq_restore(flags);
> > >
> > > irq-disable is synonymous to preempt disable so the preempt_disable()/enable()
> > > pair looks like superfluous overhead.
> >
> > yes, there's correct patch already in the list here:
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=130382756829695&w=2
>
> It helps to change the subject line when you think another patch should be
> considered, to something like:
>
> [PATCH, v2] kprobes, x86: Disable irq during optimized callback
>
> (also note the other changes i made to the title, 3 altogether.)
sorry, here it is ;) thanks
jirka
---
Disabling irqs during optimized callback, so we dont miss
any in-irq kprobes as missed.
running following:
# cd /debug/tracing/
# echo "p mutex_unlock" >> kprobe_events
# echo "p _raw_spin_lock" >> kprobe_events
# echo "p smp_apic_timer_interrupt" >> ./kprobe_events
# echo 1 > events/enable
makes the optimized kprobes to be missed. None is missed
if the kprobe optimatization is disabled.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/kprobes.c | 5 +++--
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes.c
index c969fd9..f1a6244 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes.c
@@ -1183,12 +1183,13 @@ static void __kprobes optimized_callback(struct optimized_kprobe *op,
struct pt_regs *regs)
{
struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb = get_kprobe_ctlblk();
+ unsigned long flags;
/* This is possible if op is under delayed unoptimizing */
if (kprobe_disabled(&op->kp))
return;
- preempt_disable();
+ local_irq_save(flags);
if (kprobe_running()) {
kprobes_inc_nmissed_count(&op->kp);
} else {
@@ -1207,7 +1208,7 @@ static void __kprobes optimized_callback(struct optimized_kprobe *op,
opt_pre_handler(&op->kp, regs);
__this_cpu_write(current_kprobe, NULL);
}
- preempt_enable_no_resched();
+ local_irq_restore(flags);
}
static int __kprobes copy_optimized_instructions(u8 *dest, u8 *src)
--
1.7.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists