linux-kernel - Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC PATCH] set current_state to D0 in register

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110511084354.49eee757@jbarnes-desktop>
Date:	Wed, 11 May 2011 08:43:54 -0700
From:	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
To:	Ian Campbell <ijc@...lion.org.uk>
Cc:	Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@...citrix.com>,
	"xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
	"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
	Allen Kay <allen.m.kay@...el.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC PATCH] set current_state to D0 in
 register_slot

On Wed, 11 May 2011 14:33:38 +0100
Ian Campbell <ijc@...lion.org.uk> wrote:

> Hi Jesse,
> 
> On Wed, 2011-03-16 at 16:13 +0000, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Wed, 16 Mar 2011, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > > On Wed, 16 Mar 2011 12:34:10 +0000
> > > Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Jesse,
> > > > do you have any comments on the following patch?
> > > > Also, are you OK with taking "set current_state to D0 in register_slot"
> > > > in your tree? Otherwise should I send a pull request to Linus with the
> > > > patch and your ack?
> > > 
> > > Yeah, I think the patch is ok, I can send it to Linus either as part of
> > > my 2.6.39 pull req (though it's probably too late for that) or in my
> > > next -fixes pull.
> > 
> > Great, thanks!
> > 
> > Just to be clear there are two different patches, the first one is "set
> > current_state to D0 in register_slot":
> > 
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/2/28/296
> > 
> > the second one by Ian Campbell is "acpiphp: assume device is in state D0
> > after powering on a slot.":
> > 
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/3/8/212
> 
> Looks like the first of these is in your tree but not the second. Do you
> want me to resend and/or rework it?

Yeah, please re-send it, I confused the two and thought Stefano's was
sufficient.

-- 
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/