[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1305190520.2373.18.camel@sli10-conroe>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 16:55:20 +0800
From: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"eric.dumazet@...il.com" <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
"cl@...ux.com" <cl@...ux.com>,
"npiggin@...nel.dk" <npiggin@...nel.dk>
Subject: Re: [patch v2 0/5] percpu_counter: bug fix and enhancement
Hi,
On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 16:21 +0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 10:48:13AM +0800, Shaohua Li wrote:
> > And the atomic64 approach not just improved the performance (which is
> > always welcomed), but it also fixes a bug for 32-bit system. The usage
> > of lglock is actually quite straightforward and is standard usage of
> > lglock (the comments of lglock.h declare such usage), just lglock
> > doesn't work for dynamatically allocated structure currently, which
> > needs a convert.
>
> lglock doesn't seem like the right solution for the problem at hand.
> It's way too heavy handed and used to close a very small race window.
> It doesn't seem right. Eric's idea seemed much better to me and I
> don't see why that can't be improved and used instead. Would you be
> interested in looking that direction?
sure, but it's quite difficult to determine a @maxfuzzy in his proposal
I thought (and could confuse user), did I miss anything?
Thanks,
Shaohua
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists