linux-kernel - Re: [patch v2 0/5] percpu_counter: bug fix and enhancement

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1305190936.3795.1.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date:	Thu, 12 May 2011 11:02:15 +0200
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:	Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"cl@...ux.com" <cl@...ux.com>,
	"npiggin@...nel.dk" <npiggin@...nel.dk>
Subject: Re: [patch v2 0/5] percpu_counter: bug fix and enhancement

Le jeudi 12 mai 2011 à 10:59 +0200, Tejun Heo a écrit :
> Hello,
> 
> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 04:55:20PM +0800, Shaohua Li wrote:
> > sure, but it's quite difficult to determine a @maxfuzzy in his proposal
> > I thought (and could confuse user), did I miss anything?
> 
> I don't think @maxfuzzy is necessary there.  I wrote this before but
> why can't we track the actual deviation instead of the number of
> deviation events?
> 

Thats roughly same thing (BATCH multiplicator factor apart)

Most percpu_counter users for a given percpu_counter object use a given
BATCH, dont they ?



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/