[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1305191300.2914.263.camel@laptop>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 11:08:20 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Nikhil Rao <ncrao@...gle.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Nikunj A. Dadhania" <nikunj@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Stephan Barwolf <stephan.baerwolf@...ilmenau.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 00/19] Increase resolution of load weights
On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 18:29 -0700, Nikhil Rao wrote:
> > It's a cost/benefit analysis and for 32-bit systems the benefits seem to be
> > rather small, right?
> >
>
> Yes, that's right. The benefits for 32-bit systems do seem to be limited.
deep(er) hierarchies on 32 bits still require this, it would be good to
verify that the cgroup mess created by the insanity called libvirt will
indeed work as expected.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists