[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4DCBA656.3060608@atmel.com>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 11:20:22 +0200
From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
To: "Koul, Vinod" <vinod.koul@...el.com>
CC: dan.j.williams@...el.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: at_hdmac: pause: no need to wait for FIFO
empty
Le 12/05/2011 10:28, Koul, Vinod :
> On Mon, 2011-05-09 at 18:11 +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
>> The addition of the pause feature to atc_control an active wait was introduced
>> to check the FIFO empty event. This event was not always happening and
>> a timout contition was needed.
>> But, in some cases, this event depend on the peripheral connected to the
>> channel that is paused: FIFO becomes empty if the peripheral consumes data.
>> The timeout is pretty difficult to evaluate. Moreover, this check is not
>> needed.
>> In conclusion, it seems sensible to entirely remove the checking of
>> "FIFO empty" status when pausing.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
>> ---
>> Vinod,
>>
>> This additional patch goes on top of your current "next" branch. It is a
>> removing of some code added to the pause/resume patch sent earlier and can be
>> folded into this one if you want to.
>>
> Applied with edit in commit msg, Thanks
Thanks a lot.
Bye,
--
Nicolas Ferre
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists