lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 12 May 2011 11:12:55 +1000
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@....ibm.com>
To:	Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the nfs tree

Hi Trond,

After merging the nfs tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:

fs/nfs/write.c: In function 'nfs_flush_multi':
fs/nfs/write.c:942: error: too many arguments to function 'pnfs_update_layout'
fs/nfs/write.c: In function 'nfs_flush_one':
fs/nfs/write.c:1016: error: too many arguments to function 'pnfs_update_layout'
fs/nfs/read.c: In function 'nfs_pagein_multi':
fs/nfs/read.c:291: error: too many arguments to function 'pnfs_update_layout'
fs/nfs/read.c: In function 'nfs_pagein_one':
fs/nfs/read.c:354: error: too many arguments to function 'pnfs_update_layout'

Cased by commit 4b386a0fe47b ("NFSv4.1: Ensure that layoutget uses the
correct gfp modes") which forgot to update the function declaration for
the !CONFIG_NFS_V4_1 case.

I have used the nfs tree from next-20110511 for today.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...ibm.com
IBM OzLabs Linux Technology Centre

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ