[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110512092153.GC8707@8bytes.org>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 11:21:53 +0200
From: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
Cc: "Roedel, Joerg" <Joerg.Roedel@....com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
benh <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>, davem <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] perf, x86: Use GO/HO bits in perf-ctr
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 03:58:34PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 05/10/2011 06:04 PM, Roedel, Joerg wrote:
>> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 10:48:20AM -0400, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> > On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 16:35 +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
>> > > The AMD perf-counters support counting in guest or host-mode
>> > > only. Make use of that feature when user-space specified
>> > > guest/host-mode only counting.
>> >
>> > Subject mentions x86, does Intel have anything similar so you can make
>> > it work for them too?
>>
>> Intel does not support guest or host-only counting in the hardware (at
>> least according to my documentation). If wanted it could be approximated by
>> enabling/disabling the counters in the guest-entry path.
>
> vmx has support for atomically swapping MSRs during guest entry and exit
> (you can load guest MSRs on entry, save guest MSRs on exit, and load
> host MSRs on exit, but you can't save host MSRs on entry, so host-only
> counters cannot be 100% accurate). We'd need some kvm/perf hooks to
> program these MSR swaps, and to manually save the counters that cannot
> be done automatically.
Well, wenn host counters are not saved on vmentry then we just need to
save them manually (which is a one-time thing and does not need to
happen at every vmentry).
Thanks for that information, when I am back in office on monday I'll try
to grab a machine and hopefully get this running.
> btw, your patchset can be further improved by integrating
> exclude_guest/exclude_host into the constraints. For example if we have
> three general purpose counters, two generic perf_events in user, one
> exclude_guest perf_event, and one exclude_host perf_event, we can
> schedule them all at all times, swapping the exclude_guest and
> exclude_host events during guest entry/exit.
Well, it will need some additional code in the amd vmrun path too. I'll
take a look at it, but probably leave it as a future optimization.
Thanks for the hint.
Joerg
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists