| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1305205872-10321-2-git-send-email-richard@nod.at>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 15:11:12 +0200
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, oleg@...hat.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, ying.huang@...el.com, ssp@...hat.com,
namhyung@...il.com, fweisbec@...il.com, x86@...nel.org,
hpa@...or.com, tglx@...utronix.de, robert.richter@....com,
lethal@...ux-sh.org, Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] x86: remove warning and warning_symbol from struct stacktrace_ops
Both warning and warning_symbol are nowhere used.
Let's get rid of them.
Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/stacktrace.h | 3 ---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c | 13 -------------
arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c | 16 ----------------
arch/x86/kernel/stacktrace.c | 13 -------------
arch/x86/oprofile/backtrace.c | 13 -------------
5 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/stacktrace.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/stacktrace.h
index d7e89c8..70bbe39 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/stacktrace.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/stacktrace.h
@@ -37,9 +37,6 @@ print_context_stack_bp(struct thread_info *tinfo,
/* Generic stack tracer with callbacks */
struct stacktrace_ops {
- void (*warning)(void *data, char *msg);
- /* msg must contain %s for the symbol */
- void (*warning_symbol)(void *data, char *msg, unsigned long symbol);
void (*address)(void *data, unsigned long address, int reliable);
/* On negative return stop dumping */
int (*stack)(void *data, char *name);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
index e638689..2828bca 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
@@ -1766,17 +1766,6 @@ static struct pmu pmu = {
* callchain support
*/
-static void
-backtrace_warning_symbol(void *data, char *msg, unsigned long symbol)
-{
- /* Ignore warnings */
-}
-
-static void backtrace_warning(void *data, char *msg)
-{
- /* Ignore warnings */
-}
-
static int backtrace_stack(void *data, char *name)
{
return 0;
@@ -1790,8 +1779,6 @@ static void backtrace_address(void *data, unsigned long addr, int reliable)
}
static const struct stacktrace_ops backtrace_ops = {
- .warning = backtrace_warning,
- .warning_symbol = backtrace_warning_symbol,
.stack = backtrace_stack,
.address = backtrace_address,
.walk_stack = print_context_stack_bp,
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
index e2a3f06..f478ff6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
@@ -135,20 +135,6 @@ print_context_stack_bp(struct thread_info *tinfo,
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(print_context_stack_bp);
-
-static void
-print_trace_warning_symbol(void *data, char *msg, unsigned long symbol)
-{
- printk(data);
- print_symbol(msg, symbol);
- printk("\n");
-}
-
-static void print_trace_warning(void *data, char *msg)
-{
- printk("%s%s\n", (char *)data, msg);
-}
-
static int print_trace_stack(void *data, char *name)
{
printk("%s <%s> ", (char *)data, name);
@@ -166,8 +152,6 @@ static void print_trace_address(void *data, unsigned long addr, int reliable)
}
static const struct stacktrace_ops print_trace_ops = {
- .warning = print_trace_warning,
- .warning_symbol = print_trace_warning_symbol,
.stack = print_trace_stack,
.address = print_trace_address,
.walk_stack = print_context_stack,
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/x86/kernel/stacktrace.c
index 6515733..55d9bc0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/stacktrace.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/stacktrace.c
@@ -9,15 +9,6 @@
#include <linux/uaccess.h>
#include <asm/stacktrace.h>
-static void save_stack_warning(void *data, char *msg)
-{
-}
-
-static void
-save_stack_warning_symbol(void *data, char *msg, unsigned long symbol)
-{
-}
-
static int save_stack_stack(void *data, char *name)
{
return 0;
@@ -53,16 +44,12 @@ save_stack_address_nosched(void *data, unsigned long addr, int reliable)
}
static const struct stacktrace_ops save_stack_ops = {
- .warning = save_stack_warning,
- .warning_symbol = save_stack_warning_symbol,
.stack = save_stack_stack,
.address = save_stack_address,
.walk_stack = print_context_stack,
};
static const struct stacktrace_ops save_stack_ops_nosched = {
- .warning = save_stack_warning,
- .warning_symbol = save_stack_warning_symbol,
.stack = save_stack_stack,
.address = save_stack_address_nosched,
.walk_stack = print_context_stack,
diff --git a/arch/x86/oprofile/backtrace.c b/arch/x86/oprofile/backtrace.c
index 2d49d4e..a5b64ab 100644
--- a/arch/x86/oprofile/backtrace.c
+++ b/arch/x86/oprofile/backtrace.c
@@ -16,17 +16,6 @@
#include <asm/stacktrace.h>
#include <linux/compat.h>
-static void backtrace_warning_symbol(void *data, char *msg,
- unsigned long symbol)
-{
- /* Ignore warnings */
-}
-
-static void backtrace_warning(void *data, char *msg)
-{
- /* Ignore warnings */
-}
-
static int backtrace_stack(void *data, char *name)
{
/* Yes, we want all stacks */
@@ -42,8 +31,6 @@ static void backtrace_address(void *data, unsigned long addr, int reliable)
}
static struct stacktrace_ops backtrace_ops = {
- .warning = backtrace_warning,
- .warning_symbol = backtrace_warning_symbol,
.stack = backtrace_stack,
.address = backtrace_address,
.walk_stack = print_context_stack,
--
1.7.4.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists