[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110512014656.GA12513@srcf.ucam.org>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 02:46:56 +0100
From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"mikew@...gle.com" <mikew@...gle.com>,
"a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl" <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"tj@...nel.org" <tj@...nel.org>,
"fweisbec@...il.com" <fweisbec@...il.com>,
"dle-develop@...ts.sourceforge.net"
<dle-develop@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
Satoru Moriya <satoru.moriya@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] pstore: EFI Support
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 07:27:46AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 05/11/2011 06:09 AM, Américo Wang wrote:
> >I agree. It seems that we should enable this by default when APEI and
> >EFI are both enabled, this could be done by Kconfig.
> >
>
> No, it can't. That would be a compile-time option, but the
> selection needs to be at runtime.
>
> However, it is still unclear that this is actually a win at all...
It's a win in that not all EFI platforms are ACPI. I don't think we're
yet in a position to say which is preferable when we have both.
(Are we really arguing over which broken Intel firmware spec is less
broken than the other?)
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@...f.ucam.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists