[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1305216023.2575.54.camel@mulgrave.site>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 11:00:23 -0500
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
To: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
Raghavendra D Prabhu <raghu.prabhu13@...il.com>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm: slub: Default slub_max_order to 0
On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 11:46 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 10:43:13AM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
>
> > As I said above, no released fedora version uses SLUB. It's only just
> > been enabled for the unreleased FC15; I'm testing a beta copy.
>
> James, this isn't true.
>
> $ grep SLUB /boot/config-2.6.35.12-88.fc14.x86_64
> CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG=y
> CONFIG_SLUB=y
>
> (That's the oldest release I have right now, but it's been enabled even
> before that release).
OK, I concede the point ... I haven't actually kept any of my FC
machines current for a while.
However, the fact remains that this seems to be a slub problem and it
needs fixing.
James
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists