lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BANLkTinQzWx3f11v+w588z4CFBp8QT7xmA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 12 May 2011 11:01:12 -0700
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>
Cc:	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] fuse fix for 2.6.39

On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Trond Myklebust
<Trond.Myklebust@...app.com> wrote:
>
> I was thinking rather of just returning an EIO if people try. We know
> that there are breakages w.r.t. certain operations as I pointed out in
> my previous email.

Umm. Returning an error is ok, but only if you _need_ to return an error.

Returning an error because you don't like it - that's just wrong.

So I would seriously suggest you return an error only when you really
need something from the nd. So I'd suggest
 - for the automount case, return an error, since you can't change the filp
 - for the LOOKUP_RCU case, just do the "nd && (nd->flags & LOOKUP_RCU)"

The really doesn't seem to be many cases that really need the nd, so
why make it a hard error? *Most* users of nd already check for NULL,
either directly or indirectly (ie "if (!is_atomic_open(nd)) goto
no_open")

                   Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ