[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110512202421.GA4623@p183>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 23:24:21 +0300
From: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: davej@...hat.com, eranian@...gle.com, acme@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] perf: bogus correlation of kernel symbols
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 03:01:32PM -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
> Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 14:37:41 -0400
>
> > On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 02:06:30PM -0400, David Miller wrote:
> > > I hate this too, and I think it's absolutely rediculous.
> > >
> > > Also, like you, I lost an entire afternoon trying to figure out why
> > > this started happening.
> > >
> > > I wish we could revert this change.
> >
> > At least it can be permanently disabled..
> >
> > echo kernel.kptr_restrict = 0 >> /etc/sysctl.conf
>
> Regardless, what to do about all of the "perf is broken" reports?
The problem is that they turned it on by default.
int kptr_restrict = 1;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists