[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110512212810.GA17596@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 23:28:10 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86: Make the x86-64 stacktrace code safely callable
from scheduler
* Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com> wrote:
> Avoid potential scheduler recursion and deadlock from the
> stacktrace code by avoiding rescheduling when we re-enable
> preemption.
>
> This robustifies some scheduler trace events like sched switch
> when they are used to produce callchains in perf or ftrace.
> - put_cpu();
> +
> + /* We want stacktrace to be computable anywhere, even in the scheduler */
> + preempt_enable_no_resched();
So what happens if a callchain profiling happens to be interrupted by a hardirq
and the interrupt reschedules the current task? We'll miss the reschedule,
right?
preempt_enable_no_resched() is not a magic 'solve scheduler recursions' bullet
- it's to be used only if something else will guarantee the preemption check!
But nothing guarantees it here AFAICS.
A better fix would be to use local_irq_save()/restore().
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists