[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1105131203090.2831@ionos>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 12:04:18 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...el.com>,
Glauber Costa <glommer@...hat.com>,
Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@....com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...source.com>,
Chris McDermott <lcm@...ibm.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the arm tree
On Fri, 13 May 2011, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 10:06:34AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > >
> > > * Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in
> > > > arch/x86/kernel/i8253.c between commit 3490f584b9ba ("clocksource: convert
> > > > x86 to generic i8253 clocksource") from the arm tree and commit b01cc1b0eae0
> > > > ("x86: Convert remaining x86 clocksources to clocksource_register_hz/khz")
> > > > from the tip tree.
> > > >
> > > > The former seems to supercede the latter, so I used the former.
> > >
> > > Russell, how the heck did this commit:
> > >
> > > commit 3490f584b9ba5a0b6f63832fbc9c5ec72506697b
> > > Author: Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>
> > > AuthorDate: Sun May 8 18:55:19 2011 +0100
> > > Commit: Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>
> > > CommitDate: Tue May 10 08:20:54 2011 +0100
> > >
> > > clocksource: convert x86 to generic i8253 clocksource
> > >
> > > which has such a clearly x86 diffstat:
> > >
> > > arch/x86/Kconfig | 1 +
> > > arch/x86/include/asm/i8253.h | 2 +
> > > arch/x86/kernel/i8253.c | 79 +-----------------------------------------
> > > 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 78 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > end up in the ARM tree without an ack from an x86 maintainer??
> >
> > The "no response" means two things: either that people are busy, [...]
>
> Had you asked us before committing it one day after it was posted, or had you
> *noticed* that those files are not in your tree and are already modified in
> linux-next, you'd have gotten a response like:
>
> --------------->
>
> Yes, the change looks good to me as well in principle. Thomas is busy this
> week, he is on a conference.
I saw it and missed it to reply, sorry.
> Guys if you want to do this outside of the x86 tree please test this series
> thoroughly on x86 as well before pushing it out anywhere permanent or pushing
> it into linux-next.
>
> Also note that there's also some pending changes in the x86 tree modifying
> arch/x86/kernel/i8253.c:
>
> b01cc1b0eae0: x86: Convert remaining x86 clocksources to clocksource_register_hz/khz
>
> If you want to do any further change to this file you need to pull in this
> change first or need to resolve the conflict in some other way.
If it makes things easier I can pull it through the tip/timers/.... as
well. Just let me know.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists