[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7C637C15A1AB48869F938B97BBDF22D8@subhasishg>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 17:40:42 +0530
From: "Subhasish Ghosh" <subhasish@...tralsolutions.com>
To: "Nori, Sekhar" <nsekhar@...com>, "Greg KH" <gregkh@...e.de>
Cc: "Greg KH" <greg@...ah.com>,
<davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"Watkins, Melissa" <m-watkins@...com>,
<sachi@...tralsolutions.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Randy Dunlap" <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
"open list" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 08/11] tty: add pruss SUART driver
>>
>> Say, if the driver is loaded as a module.
>> If I allocate the sram in the platform code, how to I
>> free it when the driver is unloaded.
>
> This is what I said in my last e-mail. What is
> the issue you see with this approach?
>
> | Thanks for the clarification. In this case, the driver
> | should use platform callbacks to get/put fast fifo
> | space. In case this callback is not populated by the
> | platform or returns an error, the driver should fall
> | back to allocating from DDR.
>
ok, so what you are suggesting is that I implement some
callbacks (like .fifo_alloc, .fifo_dealloc) which can allocate
memory using sram_alloc.
My doubt is, if already such API's are there (by Russel) or you
are suggesting to implement them.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists