lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110513142057.GC8970@sortiz-mobl>
Date:	Fri, 13 May 2011 16:20:58 +0200
From:	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...vell.com>
Cc:	haojian.zhuang@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	lrg@...mlogic.co.uk, broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com,
	a.zummo@...ertech.it, khali@...ux-fr.org, ben-linux@...ff.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] mfd: 88pm860x: enhance lock on i2c transaction

Hi Haojian,

On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 05:21:22PM +0800, Haojian Zhuang wrote:
> Accessing test page in 88pm860x is a sequence of read/write on i2c bus.
> Bus lock is used in each small i2c transaction. But it may result the
> whole sequence interrupted by other i2c client transaction.
Sure, but what you mainly want is your MFD i2c IO calls to be serialized, and
that's already being taken care of by the current code.
Are other i2c clients (non MFD ones) touching the same i2c registers than the
MFD ones ?

Cheers,
Samuel.

-- 
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
http://oss.intel.com/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ