linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] gpio: rename VIA local config struct

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <BANLkTi==T3MGumCAhrEyf4ipZo80eNiciA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 13 May 2011 16:54:42 +0200
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: rename VIA local config struct

2011/4/28 Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>:

> From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
>
> The local VIA GPIO config struct "gpio_config" collides with my
> extension to the gpio_chip struct, so rename it to via_gpio_config
> so we don't get this clash.
>
> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>

Even if we're not merging anything like my configuration API for
2.6.40 IMHO this patch makes sense anyway, so please consider
applying it for bringing clarity to the source code.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/