linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] x86, NMI, Treat unknown NMI as hardware error

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 13 May 2011 19:17:25 +0400
From:	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
To:	Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
CC:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] x86, NMI, Treat unknown NMI as hardware error

On 05/13/2011 12:23 PM, Huang Ying wrote:
> In general, unknown NMI is used by hardware and firmware to notify
> fatal hardware errors to OS. So the Linux should treat unknown NMI as
> hardware error and go panic upon unknown NMI for better error
> containment.
> 
> But there are some legacy machine which would randomly send unknown
> NMIs for no good reason.  To support these machines, a white list
> mechanism is provided to treat unknown NMI as hardware error only on
> some known working system.
> 
> These systems are identified via the presentation of APEI HEST or
> some PCI ID of the host bridge. The PCI ID of host bridge instead of
> DMI ID is used, so that the checking can be done based on the platform
> type instead of motherboard. This should be simpler and sufficient.
> 
> The method to identify the platforms is designed by Andi Kleen.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
> ---
...

Hi Ying,

just curious (regardless the concerns Don and Ingo have) -- if there still a need
for such semi-unknown nmi handling maybe it's worth to register a *notifier* for it
and we panic only when user *explicitly* specify how to treat this class of NMIs
(via say "hest-nmi-panic" boot option or something like that). Maybe such partially
modular scheme would be better? If only I don't miss anything.

-- 
            Cyrill
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/