linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2] usb/gadget: at91sam9g20 fix end point max packet size

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110513162054.GC2728@suse.de>
Date:	Fri, 13 May 2011 09:20:54 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>
Cc:	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, sshtylyov@...sta.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] usb/gadget: at91sam9g20 fix end point max packet size

On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 05:03:02PM +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> on 9g20 they are the same as the 9260
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>
> Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
> ---
> Resent upon Greg's request.
> Based on current linux-next.
> Applies cleanly on current linus' tree (2.6.39-rc7+)
> 
> BTW, can we imagine it going to mainline before .39-final in a "fixes" pull
> request to Linus from a at91 tree?

No, as I don't think this is a bug-fix-only-for-regression, is it?

It looks to be a "fix for new hardware" type thing, right?

And is this really the correct way to do this for the .40 kernel, which
is where I would be queueing this up for?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/