[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C79549CB6F772498162A641D92D532801B188BF@penmb01.corp.atmel.com>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 12:57:20 +0800
From: "Wu, Josh" <Josh.wu@...el.com>
To: "Russell King - ARM Linux" <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: <mchehab@...hat.com>, <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
"Haring, Lars" <Lars.Haring@...el.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <g.liakhovetski@....de>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] [media] at91: add Atmel Image Sensor Interface (ISI)support
On Thursday, May 12, 2011 5:35 PM, Russell King wrote:
> A few more points...
>> +static int __init atmel_isi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> Should be __devinit otherwise you'll have section errors.
Ok, will be fixed in V2 patch.
>> +{
>> + unsigned int irq;
>> + struct atmel_isi *isi;
>> + struct clk *pclk;
>> + struct resource *regs;
>> + int ret;
>> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>> + struct isi_platform_data *pdata;
>> + struct soc_camera_host *soc_host;
>> +
>> + regs = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
>> + if (!regs)
>> + return -ENXIO;
>> +
>> + pclk = clk_get(&pdev->dev, "isi_clk");
>> + if (IS_ERR(pclk))
>> + return PTR_ERR(pclk);
>> +
>> + clk_enable(pclk);
> Return value of clk_enable() should be checked.
Yes. I will add code to check the return value in V2 patch.
>> +
>> + isi = kzalloc(sizeof(struct atmel_isi), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!isi) {
>> + ret = -ENOMEM;
>> [...]
>> + isi_writel(isi, V2_CTRL, ISI_BIT(V2_DIS));
>> + /* Check if module disable */
>> + while (isi_readl(isi, V2_STATUS) & ISI_BIT(V2_DIS))
>> + cpu_relax();
>> +
>> + irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> This should also be checked.
Ditto, thank you.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists