[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1305263462.2831.11.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 07:11:02 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V3] net: af_packet: Untangle packet_snd by
adding vpacket_snd
Le jeudi 12 mai 2011 à 16:25 -0700, Joe Perches a écrit :
> The current packet_snd handles both vlan and non-vlan frames
> with initialization of a struct virtio_net_hdr that is unused
> by non-vlan frames.
>
> Create a new vpacket_snd that uses this virtio_net_hdr and
> remove it and the vlan and gso logic from packet_snd.
>
1) I find this kind of patches a real pain, frankly.
When I have to look around code and commits to find bugs and bugs
origins, I'll have to fully check this kind of patch, and this slow down
the process a _lot_, because I have no idea if "Joe Perches" actually
tested the patch, or if its yet another "code beautifier" process in the
wild.
You should have shooted when/before commit bfd5f4a3 (packet: Add
GSO/csum offload support) was accepted.
2) You did not CCed Sridhar Samudrala <sri@...ibm.com>, the author of
above commit. I dont think David will take the time to test your patch.
3) You add some non codingstyle artifacts. I am afraid it makes me
nervous for patches bringing no real values but shuffling the code and
making maintainers life more difficult.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists