[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4DCEB5BB.1080202@freemail.hu>
Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 19:02:51 +0200
From: Németh Márton <nm127@...email.hu>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org
CC: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: incompatible struct pci_root_info?
Hello,
I have found struct pci_root_info declaration at three different places in Linux
kernel 2.6.39-rc6. Two of them are in arch/x86 and one of them is in arch/ia64.
arch/x86/pci/bus_numa.h:8:
struct pci_root_info {
char name[12];
unsigned int res_num;
struct resource res[RES_NUM];
int bus_min;
int bus_max;
int node;
int link;
};
arch/x86/pci/acpi.c:10:
struct pci_root_info {
struct acpi_device *bridge;
char *name;
unsigned int res_num;
struct resource *res;
struct pci_bus *bus;
int busnum;
};
arch/ia64/pci/pci.c:133:
struct pci_root_info {
struct acpi_device *bridge;
struct pci_controller *controller;
char *name;
};
As far as I know it is OK to have different types on different architectures
with the same name. Is there any reason behind having two struct pci_root_info
delcaration in arch/x86?
Regards,
Márton Németh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists