[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110513.212124.1730222866632905908.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 21:21:24 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: andi@...stfloor.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, libc-alpha@...rceware.org,
ak@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] Hook up sysconf syscall for all architectures
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 16:24:19 -0700
> diff --git a/arch/sparc/include/asm/unistd.h b/arch/sparc/include/asm/unistd.h
> index 9d897b6..0b0b362 100644
> --- a/arch/sparc/include/asm/unistd.h
> +++ b/arch/sparc/include/asm/unistd.h
> @@ -404,8 +404,9 @@
> #define __NR_open_by_handle_at 333
> #define __NR_clock_adjtime 334
> #define __NR_syncfs 335
> +#define __NR_sysconf 336
>
> -#define NR_syscalls 336
> +#define NR_syscalls 337
>
x86, powerpc, and sparc entries will conflict with already assigned
slots for sys_sendmmsg() in networking tree.
And Eric W. Bierderman has changes that also add system calls to
all architectures for his "setns" namespace changes.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists