[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110514221445.GB21792@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 15:14:46 -0700
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Subhasish Ghosh <subhasish@...tralsolutions.com>,
"Nori, Sekhar" <nsekhar@...com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com,
sachi@...tralsolutions.com, Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Watkins, Melissa" <m-watkins@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/11] mfd: add pruss mfd driver.
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 10:33:53PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> I guess drivers/mfd would be a better place than drivers/misc, but it might not
> need to be an mfd driver in the sense that it registers mfd cells.
Yes, it might be more sensible to just open code. OTOH mfd_cell is
marginally easier to use.
> The more important point is to remove the device registration from the board
> file. You definitely should not have the cells in the board file, but replacing
> them with platform devices in the board file makes it no better.
Agreed entirely, it should be something higher level than that.
> My whole point has been that you register them from the main pruss driver
> based on run-time data instead of compile-time pre-configured stuff in the
> board file.
I'm not so sure - if the usage is fixed as a result of the pins on the
device being wired a CAN bus then it seems reasonable to tell the system
about that so it'll stop the user trying to run SPI or something against
it at runtime.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists