[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1105141751490.3078@ionos>
Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 17:52:34 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@....ac.uk>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] irq: export handle_simple_irq, irq_modify_status,
irq_to_desc, irq_alloc_descs and irq_free_descs
On Fri, 13 May 2011, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On 05/13/11 16:17, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Fri, 13 May 2011, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Thomas.
> >>
> >> Just a quick request that you give a yes or no to this.
> >>
> >> Thanks and sorry for repeated pestering!
> >
> > Sorry for the delay.
> >
> >>>> /**
> >>>> * irq_cpu_online - Invoke all irq_cpu_online functions.
> >>>> diff --git a/kernel/irq/irqdesc.c b/kernel/irq/irqdesc.c
> >>>> index 2c039c9..5ac14e2 100644
> >>>> --- a/kernel/irq/irqdesc.c
> >>>> +++ b/kernel/irq/irqdesc.c
> >>>> @@ -110,6 +110,7 @@ struct irq_desc *irq_to_desc(unsigned int irq)
> >>>> {
> >>>> return radix_tree_lookup(&irq_desc_tree, irq);
> >>>> }
> >>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(irq_to_desc);
> >
> > I'm fine with that, just this one makes me a bit wary.
> It does feel a little fishy. For reference of others - it's required as
> generic_handle_irq is inline in the irqdesc.h and uses it.
I know and there is no real reason why generic_handle_irq needs to be
inline.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists