linux-kernel - [PATCH 0/2] I don't like dmi_name_in

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110515181034.1af84279@endymion.delvare>
Date:	Sun, 15 May 2011 18:10:34 +0200
From:	Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>
To:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] I don't like dmi_name_in_vendors

The current implementation of dmi_name_in_vendors() looks pretty
wrong/useless to me, here's a proposal to make it better.

[PATCH 1/2] PCI: Don't use dmi_name_in_vendors in quirk
[PATCH 2/2] Make dmi_name_in_vendors more focused

Comments/opinions welcome.

-- 
Jean Delvare
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/