lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4DCF696B.8020304@kernel.org>
Date:	Sat, 14 May 2011 22:49:31 -0700
From:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To:	paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
CC:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL rcu/next] rcu commits for 2.6.40

On 05/14/2011 10:41 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On 05/14/2011 09:14 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> On 05/14/2011 11:34 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>>>> and do the inspection afterwards.
>>>
>>> And here is a lightly-tested patch, which applies on tip/core/rcu.
>>>
>>> This problem could account for both the long delays seen with e59fb312
>>> (Decrease memory-barrier usage based on semi-formal proof) and the
>>> shorter delays seen with a26ac245 (move TREE_RCU from softirq to kthread).
>>
>> yes. it fixes the problem.
>>
>> for 1024g system when hotadd mem enabled in kernel config
>>
>> [   31.814803] cpu_dev_init done
>> [   35.437163] memory_dev_init done
>>
>> even it is with gcc from opensuse 11.3
> 
> got:
> 
> [   86.931217] Switched to NOHz mode on CPU #0
> [   86.931272] Switched to NOHz mode on CPU #25
> [   86.931278] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [   86.931290] WARNING: at kernel/rcutree.c:364 rcu_enter_nohz+0x44/0x76()
> [   86.931294] Hardware name: Sun Fire X4800 M2 
> [   86.931297] Modules linked in:
> [   86.931303] Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.39-rc7-tip-yh-04836-g5e42dc2-dirty #3
> [   86.931307] Call Trace:
> [   86.931333]  [<ffffffff81080280>] warn_slowpath_common+0x85/0x9d
> [   86.931338] Switched to NOHz mode on CPU #74
> [   86.931346]  [<ffffffff810802b2>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x1c
> [   86.931356]  [<ffffffff810d3615>] rcu_enter_nohz+0x44/0x76
> [   86.931370]  [<ffffffff810ab3cb>] tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick+0x27d/0x366
> [   86.931381]  [<ffffffff810391bc>] cpu_idle+0x7a/0xcc
> [   86.931397]  [<ffffffff81bd1aa3>] rest_init+0xb7/0xbe
> [   86.931408]  [<ffffffff81bd19ec>] ? csum_partial_copy_generic+0x16c/0x16c
> [   86.931423]  [<ffffffff82738e39>] start_kernel+0x3b2/0x3bd
> [   86.931428] Switched to NOHz mode on CPU #94
> [   86.931436]  [<ffffffff827382cc>] x86_64_start_reservations+0x9c/0xa0
> [   86.931446]  [<ffffffff827384a8>] x86_64_start_kernel+0x1d8/0x1e3
> [   86.931463] ---[ end trace 2cfc591bf7de931f ]---
> [   86.931598] Switched to NOHz mode on CPU #151
> [   86.931613] Switched to NOHz mode on CPU #152

it seems gcc from Fedora 14 is not happy with this patch.

[   35.113696] cpu_dev_init done
[  155.963662] memory_dev_init done

Yinghai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ