[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1105151616530.28104@localhost6.localdomain6>
Date: Sun, 15 May 2011 16:18:17 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...shcourse.ca>
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: any value in centralizing a defn of "RUN_AT()"?
i notice that a number of drivers duplicate a macro definition of
RUN_AT():
drivers/staging/vt6655/device.h:#define RUN_AT(x) (jiffies+(x))
drivers/net/irda/au1k_ir.c:#define RUN_AT(x) (jiffies + (x))
drivers/net/hamachi.c:#define RUN_AT(x) (jiffies + (x))
drivers/net/tulip/tulip.h:#define RUN_AT(x) (jiffies + (x))
drivers/net/wireless/airo.c:#define RUN_AT(x) (jiffies+(x))
drivers/net/rrunner.c:#define RUN_AT(x) (jiffies + (x))
drivers/net/bnx2.c:#define RUN_AT(x) (jiffies + (x))
drivers/net/3c59x.c:#define RUN_AT(x) (jiffies + (x))
drivers/net/fealnx.c:#define RUN_AT(x) (jiffies + (x))
etc, etc. any value in just defining that once in jiffies.h and
letting everyone use that?
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists