[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110516111610.GD19837@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 13:16:10 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stephan.baerwolf@...ilmenau.de, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, tglx@...utronix.de
Cc: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:sched/core] sched: Fix and optimise calculation of the
weight-inverse
* tip-bot for Stephan Baerwolf <stephan.baerwolf@...ilmenau.de> wrote:
> Commit-ID: db670dac49b5423b39b5e523d28fe32045d71b10
> Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/db670dac49b5423b39b5e523d28fe32045d71b10
> Author: Stephan Baerwolf <stephan.baerwolf@...ilmenau.de>
> AuthorDate: Wed, 11 May 2011 18:03:29 +0200
> Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> CommitDate: Mon, 16 May 2011 11:01:18 +0200
Just want to highlight this aspect of Stephan's scheduler fix for the lkml
discussion:
> [ This could explain some aritmetical issues for small shares but nothing
> concrete has been reported yet so we are not confident enough to queue
> this up in sched/urgent and for -stable backport. But if anyone finds
> this commit and sees it to fix some badness then we can certainly
> change our mind! ]
> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
So this could be a -stable candidate because it's a fix and it's simple, except
that at the moment we have no reason to believe that this is a regression or a
serious bug.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists