[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110516124828.GA5943@albatros>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 16:48:28 +0400
From: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, solar@...nwall.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
peak@...o.troja.mff.cuni.cz, kees.cook@...onical.com,
dan.j.rosenberg@...il.com, eugene@...hat.com, nelhage@...lice.com,
kuznet@....inr.ac.ru, pekkas@...core.fi, jmorris@...ei.org,
yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, kaber@...sh.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6 v2] net: ping: dont call udp_ioctl()
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 09:26 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Le dimanche 15 mai 2011 à 17:44 -0400, David Miller a écrit :
>
> > Just get rid of ping_ioctl() entirely, as that is the effect of
> > this change since inet_ioctl() returns -ENOIOCTLCMD when
> > sk_prot->ioctl is NULL.
> >
> > Also get rid of asm/ioctls.h since that will be no longer needed.
>
> Sure, here is updated version, thanks.
>
> [PATCH net-next-2.6 v2] net: ping: dont call udp_ioctl()
>
> udp_ioctl() really handles UDP and UDPLite protocols.
>
> 1) It can increment UDP_MIB_INERRORS in case first_packet_length() finds
> a frame with bad checksum.
>
> 2) It has a dependency on sizeof(struct udphdr), not applicable to
> ICMP/PING
>
> If ping sockets need to handle SIOCINQ/SIOCOUTQ ioctl, this should be
> done differently.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Acked-by: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com>
Thanks,
--
Vasiliy Kulikov
http://www.openwall.com - bringing security into open computing environments
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists